this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2024
638 points (92.9% liked)

Technology

59646 readers
4056 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Tesla Cybertruck gets less than 80% of advertised range in YouTuber’s test::A YouTuber took Tesla’s Cybertruck on a ride to see if it can actually hit its advertised 320-mile range, only to find out that its could only reach 79% of the target. When YouTuber Kyle Conn…

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Why is the efficiency lower on highways?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Due to electric drivetrains having minimal fixed losses at low speed unlike internal combustion engines. Aerodynamic losses start becoming the largest factor for EVs at relatively low speeds (25-35 MPH) since other losses at so low. This shows up on tests as higher city efficiency and lower highway.

For an internal combustion engine you are burning a large amount of energy just to keep the engine running, so the slower the speed, the less distance traveled for the fixed amount of running losses and lower the MPG. It isn't until higher speeds (55-65 MPH) that aerodynamic losses become the largest factor. This manifests as lower efficiency in the city tests and higher highway.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

It's also a factor that acceleration/deceleration in an ICE kills mileage. Highway tests maintain a constant speed. If you ran the same test at 35 mph, they would get much better mileage than at 55 (or 70)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

Also regenerative breaking is not useful when you're maintaining constant speed on the highway, but a huge leg-up in the city

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Idle losses are real but not very substantial in a modern engine compared to the bigger factor you're missing which is that in city driving tests there is a lot of speeding up and slowing down, ICE vehicles throw away all the energy used to slow down as heat in the brakes which makes city cycles particularly inefficient while an EV captures that energy through regenerative braking, dramatically reducing the net cost of those momentum changes.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Ah, good point, the speed changes for ICE results in lots of energy wasted as heat instead of being recaptured. That would certainly be the largest loss for an ICE in the city cycle.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Regenerative braking only can recapture something like 2-5% of lost energy. The bigger factor is exactly what the other person said.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

I'm not sure where that number came from but according to Wikipedia the conversion from momentum to electricity loses 10-20% and the conversion from electricity to battery storage is another 10-20% leaving a theoretical recovery at 60-70%. In real world tests, Teslas recovered 20-32% range with regenerative braking, a far cry from 2-5% you cite. https://electrek.co/2018/04/24/regenerative-braking-how-it-works/

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

This is just not true. Regenerative braking is much more efficient than that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

That makes sense, thanks.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

It has the aerodynamics of a brick

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So does the EV9, but it exceeded the EPA range in the same test.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This was a highway test though, not how EPA test the ranges

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

I know. But this YouTube channel, Out of Spec, runs this exact same 70mph loop in every EV. A large number of them exceed their EPA rated range in this test. I mentioned the EV9 because it's similar to the Cybertruck in many ways (a brick...), and I had just watched that range test this week.

Also worth noting the guy is a Tesla fanboy, so he's not going to deliberately make the CT look bad.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago

Aha yes, but what about other EVs?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

There’s more air resistance at higher speeds.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That doesn't explain why ICE vehicles are much better efficiency-wise than EV ones at higher speeds, just why EVs don't do so well. Another post responding to me addresses it well.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Do you mean that ICE is more efficient than EV at higher speeds, or that ICE scales better than EV?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

ICE vehicles have better MPG at higher speeds, EVs at lower speeds.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Neither. ICE reaches its best efficiency at higher speeds than EV does, but it is still less efficient than EV at all speeds.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Aerodynamic drag increases with the square of speed. Other frictional losses might follow a similar pattern.

Cars have other sources of inefficiency too (such as idle power consumption), so all cars have a different optimum speed for maximum range (which depends on wind speed, direction & temperature too).