this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2024
835 points (96.8% liked)

Data Is Beautiful

6961 readers
2 users here now

A place to share and discuss data visualizations. #dataviz


(under new moderation as of 2024-01, please let me know if there are any changes you want to see!)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

New York Times managed this with eloquence.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 26 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This is more likely a case where the people that were only outside were never even convicted of a crime.

The FBI seems to be after the people they have credible evidence of actually engaging in violence or planned violence.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago (2 children)

For clarity, I’m assuming you meant “accused” or “tried” rather than “convicted.”

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

Yes, that is what I meant.

Language is hard sometimes

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

Yeah, the feds have an astonishingly high conviction rate in general, because they typically only bother prosecuting the cases they know they can win. By the time you’re indicted, their case against you is likely already ironclad. Which brings us to the current post, where the overwhelming majority of people who were prosecuted either took a plea deal or were found guilty.