this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2024
633 points (100.0% liked)

196

16423 readers
2046 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 135 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (4 children)

idk about betray humanity. second movie made it pretty clear that the humans weren't there for the good of humanity - it was to profit off (and destroy in the process) Pandora's natural resources for the benefit of a few rich billionaires

[–] [email protected] 60 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Would’ve been interesting if the whale blubber they were harvesting in the second movie cured cancer instead of being some luxury, “it makes you look young” juice.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

It makes it more accurate though for them to kill a multiton animal for an ounce of proteins

[–] [email protected] 22 points 10 months ago

Just like killings rhino's for their horns, so they can make their pps hard

[–] [email protected] 19 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Anything organic like would be more efficient to synthesize after it's discovery. If the writers said it can't be synthesized, it would just be the writers pushing a false dichotomy. Very few things can't be synthesized and the things that can't, are harvested responsibly, like horseshoe crab blood.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago

The problem with sci-fi is that it comes with its own solutions. A responsible society would engineer a brainless whale it could grown in tanks back home.

The problem comes when the usual culprits of capitalism (e.g. top-down management, the unyielding greed of shareholders for quick profits, decisions made based on limited information and no ingenuity) stop us from invoking a working solution.

Competition between companies is supposed to fuel innovation and non-evil production, but mostly it promotes anti-competitive practices.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

But then it's not natural! If I'm a future space billionaire, of course I'd want the real stuff with animal suffering involved, duh.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Normally, I'm against fraud, but if I could make a businesses of selling fake Rhino Horn Dick medicine to showoff millionaires, I would.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Just fill some mason jars with some sort of powder (maybe plaster?) put a picture of a rhino on it and sell each one for $500.

Edit: Maybe small vials full of ground-up fingernail would be more "realistic"?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

I was joking, but there's already counterfeit rhino horns being put out by conservationists.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You would think that, with their technology, they would be able to grow the material in a lab. Would probably be cheaper too.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago

The suffering is the point

[–] [email protected] 39 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I've only seen the first one and I'm pretty sure they made that clear in the first one.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Nah, they just wanted to help make the region stable like the U.S. did with [insert third world country with oil or equivalent resources].

[–] [email protected] 16 points 10 months ago

Wow who would have ever seen that coming