AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND

764 readers

569 users here now

This is a page for anything that's amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.

♦ ♦ ♦

RULES

① Each player gets six cards, except the player on the dealer's right, who gets seven.

② Posts, comments, and participants must be amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.

③ This page uses Reverse Lemmy-Points™, or 'bad karma'. Please downvote all posts and comments.

④ Posts, comments, and participants that are not amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound will be removed.

⑤ This is a non-smoking page. If you must smoke, please click away and come back later.

Please also abide by the instance rules.

♦ ♦ ♦

Can't get enough? Visit my blog.

♦ ♦ ♦

Please consider donating to Lemmy and Lemmy.World.

$5 a month is all they ask — an absurdly low price for a Lemmyverse of news, education, entertainment, and silly memes.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

569

92% of Republicans, 78% of independents and 58% of Democrats believe crime is rising, as crime rates plummet (1ft.io)

submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

91 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Original link

If people aren't panicked, they wouldn't elect panic-pandering politicians, so there must always be a panic — crime, drugs, commies, libruls, etc.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'm curious, do you have any ideas about where else we could get crime statistics?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That's not really my point, is it?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Well, what is your point? If we can't trust the statistics we do have "because police are just making them up", then ... we know nothing at all about crime levels? That doesn't seem helpful. You must have some idea of what could be done better.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 11 months ago

Exactly what I said. That the data is thin.

you must have some idea of what could be done better.

If I don't, does that invalidate my point? Does the cited data become more reliable somehow?