this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2023
510 points (98.9% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

53370 readers
687 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-FiLiberapay


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Article about a recent revelation by the Youtube Channel Modern Vintage Gaming: The game "Alien Resurrection" by Argonaut contains a code which allows to run burned CD copies of Playstation 1 games.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 87 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (12 children)

Good luck getting a copy if you don't already have one, scalpers have already raided everywhere.

Edit: apparently the Christmas drinking has affected my reading comprehension

Still a warning for anyone else thinking the same

[–] [email protected] 68 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (10 children)

Holy fuck, I had no idea. I just checked the prices online and they are absolutely insane. Why is it so expensive? I got the game and the console for like 20 Euros about 10 years ago. It's not in great condition though.

Edit: Oh, it's just so expensive because of this video? That's pretty crazy.

[–] [email protected] 85 points 8 months ago (8 children)

Because scalpers expected this to be in demand after the news broke and set their bots to buy every cheap copy by unknowing private sellers in order to create a oligopoly and heavily gauge pricing

[–] [email protected] 19 points 8 months ago (2 children)

But isn't the whole point to play a burned copy of the game?
This seems like scalping concert tickets to a concert that allows you to copy tickets in the printer.

[–] loutr 58 points 8 months ago (1 children)

No, the point is to use a legit copy of this game to run burned copies of other games.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Which is silly for scalpers to try to profit off of this. You may get some short-term profits, but there are plenty of ways to circumvent copy protection on PS1 that are much cheaper and easier to work with than this.

It's also seemingly just an experiment that a dev decided to sneak into the game, so there's no guarantee that the loaded game will actually play reliably.

I'll wait for the hype to cool off and some real data about performance to exist before I consider buying it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

Oh yeah, this is a bubble, but fwiw, there should be minimal compatibility issues possible from my understanding as this is essentially the change disk mechanism we see in several games, but without the check that the correct disk has been inserted. Of course there'll be edge cases (and I'm gonna imagine there might be some late stage additional copy protection in some games that doesn't rely on the boot up checks), but on hardware as simple as the playstation it's going to be pretty much: if you're running the executable, you're running the game as if it's passed the checks

[–] [email protected] 23 points 8 months ago (1 children)

No, the legit copy of the game allows you to play pirated copies of other games. It bypasses the piracy check in the console and allows you to swap discs to a pirated copy of whatever other game you want.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago (1 children)

While I agree, there are entire communities built around retro consoles. But that also means legit copies of retro games can be difficult to come by.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

Sure, but at these prices, it's less expensive to get a modded PS1.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)