this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2023
667 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

59719 readers
2658 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Dropbox removed ability to opt your files out of AI training::undefined

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I looked into backblaze and was kind of turned off by the egress fee though I doubt I would exceed that for backups unless I had some really bad luck. Dropbox integrates with a lot of apps and that provides some value to me and with the comparable pricing Dropbox seems safer.

That said I'd love to hear more because I think my situation sounds similar to yours. "$6/TB/Month. No Hidden Fees. No Delete Penalties" but then it says "Storage: $0.006 GB/Month Download: Free up to 3x monthly storage" and I'm confused, is it $6 a month for a TB or is it $0.62 for 1024 GB at $0.0006 GB/Month?

[โ€“] sloppy_diffuser 1 points 11 months ago

You pay for what you use. I have somewhere around 120-140GB and get a bill every 2 months. I think it has to be near a dollar you owe for them to invoice.

Be mindful of the class A/B/C transactions at the bottom of the page with pricing. I paid about $0.60 when I first set everything up in Class C transactions. I haven't gone over the free 2500 or whatever they give you since.

I don't use it quite like Dropbox with a watch daemon. I have an encrypted local back up I mount with rclone, do my work, then use rclone again to sync to b2 when I unmount it.

I wouldn't use to version control some project I'm working on where files change frequently. Those transactions would probably kill the cost savings at some point.