this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2023
1134 points (91.5% liked)

Technology

59559 readers
3458 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 20 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (21 children)

You're downplaying your own part, in between those two statements.

Internet rando: "I choose to enable this corporate, repeat privacy offender in strongarming its way into the open, federated web"

Edit: spelling

[–] MostlyHarmless 3 points 11 months ago (20 children)

How is Threads going to breach your privacy by federating with your instance? How is de federating from Threads going to protect your privacy?

[–] prole 12 points 11 months ago (13 children)

Do you think this is Threads' final form? Embrace, extend, extinguish. This is what corporations do. Everything is a zero sum game in their minds, and they will act in the best interest of shareholders. That shit has no business here.

[–] MostlyHarmless 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, yeah, parrot the line and then please explain how?

Extending means making extra functionality that others haven't implemented, so that your offering is more attractive. You use it to build a walled garden. Defederation just skips that step and does it for them. They don't even have to extend.

[–] prole 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You missed the point of my comment. I don't need to explain how, I'm sure they've got brilliant engineers working hard on it. This is just how capitalism works, Meta isn't a benevolent force here, their ultimate goal is to make money off users and their data.

I don't need to figure out exactly how they will do it to know that they will.

[–] MostlyHarmless 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Ah, so just fear mongering and hoping that the fear based knee-jerk reaction isn't actually playing directly into their hands.

[–] Croquette 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Dude, Meta has a terrible track record. They've shown us time and time again that they are outright evil. Why would it be different this time?

What's the saying? "When someone shows you who their are, trust them the first time"

In this instance, Meta has shown time and time again who they are and you still believe they will do something right.

[–] MostlyHarmless 4 points 11 months ago

I'm not saying it's different. I'm saying that the current plan in no achieves the goal of keeping the fediverse open and out of the control of large corporations.

If you want to know how to prevent them from taking control, you better start working out the specifics of how they will do that. Otherwise your actions may end up helping them.

No one seems to have considered the possibility that Facebook are well aware of what people think of them. That they looked at the technology and thought "we don't have to do anything, those idiots hate us so much they will do the job for us and give us the private marketplace we desire"

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)