this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2023
202 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

57472 readers
3689 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
202
2023 in social media: the case for the fediverse (www.theverge.com)
submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
21 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 31 points 8 months ago (4 children)

I was excited to see this article written on the verge but then I read it. Seems like they are only interested in what the fediverse can do now that Threads is getting in and sticking their foot in the door. It's likely they needed Meta as a corporation to validate federation as something with real potential. We need to be highly critical about the entities who just see this as another way to make money off our data

[–] [email protected] 19 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Vergecast people and @[email protected] who wrote this piece have been on board with Activity Pub for much longer than Threads has even been a thing.

I do wonder if they know about Lemmy though :)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

They did mention Lemmy in the article.

[–] Reverendender 4 points 8 months ago

I honestly don’t see how this was your takeaway from the article. That’s not at all what they were saying.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That's a ridiculous take, can't believe it has so many upvotes. The Verge has staff on Mastodon for a while now.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

The Verge has staff on Mastodon for a while now.

Is this an article for staff of The Verge? Or is it for an audience that might only relate to something if it's connected to something they've heard of?