this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2023
861 points (98.2% liked)

Games

32712 readers
1353 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Suffering and success.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 89 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (5 children)

You misunderstand. Larian is the company that made the BG3 video game, and they haven't laid people off.

However it's a licensed game. Baldur's Gate and D&D are IPs that are owned by a company called Wizards of Coast. And Wizards is owned by Hasbro. Hasbro is forcing layoffs at Wizards, specifically on the D&D team because it doesn't print money as efficiently as say, Magic the Gathering does.

The people at Wizards, i.e the people who actually make D&D are no doubt passionate wonderful people. But Hasbro (and probably some of the Wizards management) are awful corporate parasites determined to suck every last penny from their properties.

They don't give a shit how loved a product is, if it's not making $100M per year then it's basically worthless to them and they won't fund it. So layoffs happen.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago (2 children)

then it's basically worthless to them

Cool. Make it independent again.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No-o-o, because then it may make money for others, think about all the lost profits. Better shut them completely /s

[–] burgundymyr 4 points 11 months ago

This is sadly a much more likely scenario

load more comments (2 replies)