277
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 26 points 7 months ago

To be fair: snaps can work for all kinds of things all over the stack from the kernel to individual applications, while flatpak just does applications. Canonical is building a lot around those abilities to handle lower level things, so I guess it makes sense for them.

IMHO flatpak does the applications better and more reliably and those are what I personally care for, so I personally stay away from snaps.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

Fair point. For instance one thing that sucks about flatpaks is that you can't torsocks them

this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2023
277 points (98.3% liked)

Programmer Humor

18388 readers
799 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS