this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2023
191 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

57472 readers
3568 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Tesla claims California false-advertising law violates First Amendment::Tesla fights DMV complaint that Autopilot is falsely advertised as autonomous.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 82 points 8 months ago (2 children)

This kind of "self driving" shouldn't even be legal. Giving a driver a explicit reason not to pay attention but still instructing them and expecting them to pay attention is a recipe for disaster. I don't know whose bright idea that was, maybe an accident lawyer, but it has been quite deadly.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 8 months ago (1 children)

My favourite clip is the one where the Tesla, seconds after repeatedly trying to kill a cyclist, decides that it’s a train and tries to go on the train tracks instead.

And people pay for that bullshit.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

And they made it a subscription too so you have to keep paying

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If you take your eyes off the road for more than 3-5 seconds (depending on speed), it beeps at you. Doing this 3 times in about 5 mins will lock you out of the system and give you a strike. 5 strikes in about 6-9 months, you lose access to the “self driving”.

It’s way more aggressive than it used to be at least.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Even if that is true and the system is perfect at doing so....

This does nothing to refute his point. It's still giving a reason not to pay attention while requiring that you pay attention.

Even if it is accurately able to assess whether you are, and act accordingly, it is still giving you a reason not to pay attention. All your statement does is reinforce that it's requiring you to pay attention, which was part of his point.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Definitely not refuting the point. Just noting that it’s very aggressive in making sure you’re watching the road. I can’t even look at the screen where the map is for too long or it gives me a warning beep.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

How does the car know where your looking? Don’t you have your hands on the steering wheel? I have a lane keep assist feature in my car and it has you take the wheel every 15 secs if it hasn’t felt your hand weight on the wheel.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

There’s a camera in the cabin that faces the driver. It’s above the rear view mirror. It does also feel the weight of your hand on the wheel and gets mad if that’s missing.