this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2023
13 points (100.0% liked)

General Discussion

12037 readers
247 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy.World General!

This is a community for general discussion where you can get your bearings in the fediverse. Discuss topics & ask questions that don't seem to fit in any other community, or don't have an active community yet.


🪆 About Lemmy World


🧭 Finding CommunitiesFeel free to ask here or over in: [email protected]!

Also keep an eye on:

For more involved tools to find communities to join: check out Lemmyverse!


💬 Additional Discussion Focused Communities:


Rules

Remember, Lemmy World rules also apply here.0. See: Rules for Users.

  1. No bigotry: including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. Be thoughtful and helpful: even with ‘silly’ questions. The world won’t be made better by dismissive comments to others on Lemmy.
  4. Link posts should include some context/opinion in the body text when the title is unaltered, or be titled to encourage discussion.
  5. Posts concerning other instances' activity/decisions are better suited to [email protected] or [email protected] communities.
  6. No Ads/Spamming.
  7. No NSFW content.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/1005198

I would assume it is, since the server only needs to serve the API calls and not the whole web site code?

If so, getting people to use the apps could help with the current wave of users a little.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In general the database queries themselves are the most expensive. That and maybe the ActivityPub messages. The HTML/Javascript content from the browser should be nothing in comparison, especially since it's static. So in the end, it shouldn't matter if you're using a mobile client or a browser, assuming both are optimized.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That sounds perfectly logical, but for some reason the site through a web browser has been significantly slower than in an app like Jebora for me.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I haven't looked at the code for either the web-UI nor Jebora, so I can't say if either are written optimally. In theory they should be comparable at least because they are written by the same developers, but who knows...

But that's interesting, for myself on Jebora, it's slow as molasses. I constantly get network timeouts and JSON errors. On the browser it at least feels smooth, just longer load times.