World News

32351 readers

353 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

343

US vetoes UN resolution calling for Gaza ceasefire (www.semafor.com)

submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

81 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The U.S. vetoed a UN Security Council resolution Friday calling for a ceasefire to the fighting in Gaza.

The U.S. and Israel have opposed calls for a ceasefire, saying it would strengthen Hamas.

The vote was delayed for several hours over worries the U.S. would veto it. Diplomats from several Arab nations met with U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken to try to convince the U.S. to abstain from voting.

As a permanent member of the council, the U.S. has veto power, and had signaled it planned to block the resolution. The U.K. abstained from the vote, while the 13 other members of the council voted for it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[+] tabarnaski -18 points 11 months ago (4 children)

[removed by mod]

[–] [email protected] 22 points 11 months ago

Resistance to occupation is legal and moral. Israelis are the aggressors.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Of course not. The occupied have a legal right to struggle against their occupiers “by all available means, including armed struggle”.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 11 months ago

So that's why all the IDF stans are so anti un

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

The security council didn't condemn the raid on October 7th for the same reason they don't condemn any non-state actor doing anything. It's not their job.

Take a look at all the resolutions proposed, or enacted.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Security_Council_resolution

Most of them are boring as fuck, except that each one is talking about some sort of conflict or other threat to peace, but viewed through the lens of member nations. That's their jurisdiction.

You will see one sort of exception, the UN security council did condemn the 9/11 attacks. That was the only time that I can find that they condemned a non-state actor, and even that was mostly a call for member states to co-operate with anti-terrorism measures that had been previously agreed on.