this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2023
2 points (100.0% liked)

Data Hoarder

24 readers
1 users here now

We are digital librarians. Among us are represented the various reasons to keep data -- legal requirements, competitive requirements, uncertainty of permanence of cloud services, distaste for transmitting your data externally (e.g. government or corporate espionage), cultural and familial archivists, internet collapse preppers, and people who do it themselves so they're sure it's done right. Everyone has their reasons for curating the data they have decided to keep (either forever or For A Damn Long Time (tm) ). Along the way we have sought out like-minded individuals to exchange strategies, war stories, and cautionary tales of failures.

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 

I run a shared server for a group of friends and we finally all have stable income in order to do offsite backups. I looked into it and I believe backblaze to be my best option(looked into rclone for running the backups but I'm open to suggestions).

โ€‹

The thing is I've got a folder from a user who just dumped everything from all his drives with the intent of organizing it on the server. I deduplicated that data with hardlinks(files with same name, size and hash to ensure no false positives) in the name of saving space but my question now is: would I be able to preserve those hardlinks in any way or would syncing that data to backblaze duplicate it again?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

deduplicating is fine, the question is what it will do on a restore.

As far as I can tell from searching the web, duplicacy will restore two (or more) hard linked files as separate files. (Apart from the obvious one of losing the connection, your restore directory takes more space than the original).

Restic (again searching, but this I can probably test since I use restic) will restore them properly -- i.e., preserving the hard link