this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2023
6 points (87.5% liked)

Self-Hosted Main

502 readers
1 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

For Example

We welcome posts that include suggestions for good self-hosted alternatives to popular online services, how they are better, or how they give back control of your data. Also include hints and tips for less technical readers.

Useful Lists

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

So I recently managed to make my Self-Hosted mailserver an Open Relay. This is bad.

My mailserver (dockerized mailcow) currently runs on a little NUC under my stairs. It has worked well with only minor problems over the 3 or so years I've had it running; I got spamhaused once, etc.

The problem all started with me trying to patch a percieved security hole. See, docker doesn't respect firewalls like UFW or firewalld (all based on iptables of course), instead opting to allow ports through iptables as you add -p flags to your containers in spite of any other rules you may have.

Now I thought this was rather terrible. I don't want to have to look both at my firewall and at all my docker port bindings to check if something is open. So as many of us would do, I started trawling the internet for solutions and started to learn about why this behaviour existed.

According to some articles/stackoverflows/etc. the way to stop docker messing with iptables and creating its own rules is to disable the feature in the daemon.json. Seems simple enough. The only caveat that I found mentioned was that container networking would break (in terms of internet reachability) but that's ok because I just had to add a firewalld rule to allow masquerading and that problem was solved.

Now the problem I failed to see was that of NAT changing. Prior to disabling the iptables flag, the mailserver would see connections' IPs as their real public ones. However afterwards, every single IP was that of the internal docker network default route.

I didn't think much of it at the time, merely that it would be more annoying to see who was connecting but that was fine because I had what I wanted. Firewalld was now the sole controller of my ports πŸŽ‰

Little did I know (or maybe I did and just forgot) that postfix has a trusted list of IPs and it will relay anything from them without question. These IPs include internal IPs such as that of the default route...

So essentially every SMTP request was being NATed to have a sender address of 172.22.1.1 and postfix started sending EVERYTHING πŸ˜΅β€πŸ’«

It wasn't long before a plethora of bots had saturated my poor NUC with HUNDERDS OF THOUSANDS of emails.

I got home this evening to lag spikes in Tarkov which prompted me to check the server where I found this mess.

After taking everything down, re-enabling the iptables and flushing all the postfix queues, I was able to spin back up and not have the whole thing start spiralling again.

Some tips for those hosting mailservers:

I'm gonna go cry myself to sleep now and pray that the big mail hosts like Google and Microsoft take pity on me and my screw up. (We all know I'll never be able to send another email to Microsoft again, who am I kidding)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I did something similar way back in 2002 and my ISP shut me down hard. I'm surprised any ISP in this day and age allows a residential connection send any emails out.

This is one of the many reasons I won't ever host an email server again.

Good luck!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Spectrum in the US allows the customer to replace their provided router with their own equipment, so all they provided to me is the modem, after that I have my own router, so I can pretty much do whatever I want. Never had an issue hosting a mail server, sending/receiving works perfect.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

This has got nothing to do with hosting your own equipment like routers (with recent regulatory changes, all ISPs in the US are now required to allow this - i.e. be able to run your own equipment without paying a monthly fee to the ISP).

But this is more about ISPs blocking sending on specific ports like port 25 for SMTP. Instead you need to use some mail relay to send your email, who in turn will send the mail over SMTP on port 25.

Some ISPs in the US do allow port 25 SMTP, but very few and none of the large ones like Comcast, AT&T, Verizon.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Spectrum is the second largest ISP in the US and I have zero issues sending or receiving on my mail server, no relay in place

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

They can't really stop you from sending emails out without potentially breaking legitimate mail. They can stop email from being submitted to you by blocking port 25/465/587 inbound though.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Most consumer ISPs these days block outgoing 25, and it's been that way since the late 90s. Third party mail providers generally ask you to use 465 or 587 for that reason.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

I just tested with four separate West coast ISPs and none of them are blocking outgoing port 25. Maybe it's a regional thing

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I'm praying mine hasn't realised πŸ˜… And thanks, I'll need it

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Plusnet don’t mind you running a mail server, I recall reading articles about it on their forum. May be worth a quick search for your own reassurance :)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

They also allow you to control the firewall and port 25 at https://www.plus.net/member-centre/broadband/firewall