this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2023
2 points (100.0% liked)

Hardware

53 readers
1 users here now

A place for quality hardware news, reviews, and intelligent discussion.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

RDNA1 and 2 were pretty successful. Vega was very successful in APUs, just didn't scale well for gaming, but was still successful for data center. You can't hit them all, especially when you have a fraction of the budget that your competition has.

Also, he ran graphic divisions, not a Walmart. People don't fail upwards in these industries at these levels. When they fail upwards working in some other industries, they fail to middle management. Somewhere you're not in the spotlight, and out of the public's eye, but don't get to make final decisions. Somewhere to push you out of the way. Leading one of less than a handful graphics divisions in the world is not where you land.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

RDNA1 and 2 were pretty successful

AMD's dGPU marketshare has been doing terribly these last few years. Clearly they weren't successful enough.

Vega was very successful in APUs

Compared to what? Intel?

but was still successful for data center

AMD's marketshare in the datacenter is pretty darn negligible.

Also, he ran graphic divisions, not a Walmart. People don't fail upwards in these industries at these levels.

Why do you think it's any different? There are plenty of high profile examples even at the CEO level?

The fact is that every notable initiative Raja's been a part of for the past decade-ish has been a failure vs original targets. At a certain point, one has to acknowledge a common factor.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

If anything RDNA3 could be considered a failure