Conservative

389 readers

99 users here now

A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff

Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.
We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.
Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.

A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

-15

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

30 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Yes, it says it's false. Here's the pertinent line:

identifies whether they may be impaired and prevents or limits motor vehicle operation "if an impairment is detected."

That's called a killswitch.

On the law itself, it's Section 24220 - b - 1 - a - ii AND 24220 - b - 1 - b - ii

Just a reminder that fact checkers blatantly lie, and will even tell you they're lying. It takes like two minutes to fact check laws like this.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The headline lies. Correct me if I'm wrong, but its a motte and bailey.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

By the definition of the above tweet (which is what the article is talking about) there is no kill switch.