this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2023
2 points (100.0% liked)

Football / Soccer / Calcio / Futebol / Fußball

145 readers
1 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (6 children)

You guys are a money-no-object club, you can absolutely afford to take the gambles and pocket the wins. United are having to budget carefully for FFP and they’ve blown a fortune on transfer fee/wages here!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I assume there is a /s here lol.

We signed Silva on a free...and we also stay within FFP by selling/loaning players.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wages still count for FFP. He’s not playing for free.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Our wage bill is smaller than City's, Arsenal's, and United's...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What part of that doesn’t mean giving a huge contract to an aging player is a risk? You seem to be arguing that it’s not a risk because he was signed on a free transfer.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

We give Silva 1 year deals that he and Chelsea must agree to extend...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

United have even more money than chelsea, just chelsea sometimes actually sell players they've spunked away all their money on so they can spunk away some more money

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

You guys are a money-no-object club, you can absolutely afford to take the gambles and pocket the wins.

huh wasn't thiago silva was a free transfer though?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

United fans and crying about money when they're just as bad, name a better combo

united just do shit business

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

United is also a money-no-object club lol. They are just bad at it

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

This has to be a copypasta