this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

AMD

26 readers
4 users here now

For all things AMD; come talk about Ryzen, Radeon, Threadripper, EPYC, rumors, reviews, news and more.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (8 children)

Their last "high end" before the RX 6900 XT was the Vega VII and before that Vega 64, yeah they only were able to compete with the RTX 2080 and GTX 1080 respectively but so does the RX 7900 XTX that can only compete with the RTX 4080...

PS.: Also the high end AMD GPU before Vega 64 was the R9 Fury X (R9 390X was a 290X refresh that launched in the same period), that was quite competitive with the GTX 980 Ti but it's 4 GB of HBM and and the necessity to be water cooled limited its sales...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (5 children)

forgot about vega's existence tbh

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Sadly they weren't that impactful besides the Vega 56 - competed very well with the GTX 1070 and Nvidia launched the GTX 1070 Ti because of it - they consumed too much power at stock because of overvoltage and they launched way too late...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

loved my Vega 56, performed well, and a little undervolting fixed the power issue big time... didn't feel like I were missing out for "not buying Nvidia"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

It really was a good GPU, sadly the 1st impression Vega gave wasn't good stacked with being one year late, overvolted and barely could reach the GTX 1080 at launch...

I would've gotten one if they weren't quite uncommon in my country, even Navi was a lot more easy to find in the used market so I ended up getting a RX 5700 that's serving me very well!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)