this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2023
0 points (50.0% liked)

Hardware

47 readers
1 users here now

A place for quality hardware news, reviews, and intelligent discussion.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

This is just a nitpicking question. Do Intel chips still have some space/transistors dedicated to SSE3? If they do, why can't they implement SSE3 by other, more powerful instrutions (like AVX) to save die space?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

The way x86 instructions are variable length and not self-synchronizing means that you can see up to 15% of your core's power budget go to decode if you aren't running in the small cache of decoded instructions, at least a few generations ago when last I heard. That isn't huge but it does mean that x86 architects have to put thought into how wide to make it, they can't just size it to make sure it's never a bottleneck like ARM designers can.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Mate, the 90s were a few decades back. ;-)

x86 decoding hasn't been a limiter since then.