this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2023
1 points (66.7% liked)

Hardware

33 readers
1 users here now

A place for quality hardware news, reviews, and intelligent discussion.

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Watching nothing but CNN for 24/7 doesn't seem like a particularly realistic test. Also basing conclusions on a sample of 1 is also rather misleading.

Since we are doing anecdotal "evidence", here is mine tonally scientific test: I bought my Alienware aw3423dw at release and have been using it as my work and gaming monitor since than. I use dark mode and don't watch CNN on my monitor, but it has over 6000 hours of use so far and no burn in...

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

It is not meant to be realistic. It is meant to be accelerated. If the TV is fine after watching thousands of hours of CNN with vibrant fixed elements then dark mode desktop users or gamers who play a lot of games with static UI elements should also be absolutely fine.

It is also great for indicating after how many hours you will start to see issues. For some that might happen in less than a year and for others it might be 4/5 years.

Sample size of 1 is an issue but a lot of the panels are used in multiple TVs, the QD OLED is used in both the S95B and A95K and the 2nd gen is in both the S95C and A95L. The WOLED panels LG make are used in a lot of TVs so really the sample size is quite a lot broader than a single panel.

load more comments (3 replies)