this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2023
415 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

57472 readers
3655 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

YouTube warns it might make your viewing experience worse if you don't turn off your ad-blocker::YouTube has been cracking down on people using ad blockers. Now, a spokesperson says that using ad blockers could lead to "suboptimal viewing."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 27 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

There's already a sponsor blocker extension that skips when a sponsor is even mentioned, it would be trivial to add other embedded ads to it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (3 children)

They would just be able to create and stream 2 or more ad-encoded versions where ads are encoded in differently positions. Then no sponsorblock could save us since it would skip the wrong segments for some people..

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Those ads would need to be unskippable, otherwise we could just pull the timestamps that the Skip button uses and sponsorblock will be all complete again 👌

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Fair point! I wasn't thinking they would be skippable, but boy do I hope that I was wrong...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Even if they're not natively skippable, ads have to be indicated as such by law. Whatever indication they use can be detected and used to create blockers.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Ad blocking, uh, finds a way.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Just build a database of ads. Then use some kind of image hash to compare against the displayed content.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I like your way of thinking. This isn't even limited to image. Comparing just a short snippet of the audio from a playing ad to a db could work very well too, thinking of how quickly Shazam etc. are able to identify a song if it's in the db.

App/plugin idea for the sad future right there: Shazadblock, tuneBlock Origin. Succesful ID leads to skip/mute/ragequit or whatever will kill the noise. Though, the downside of this method would be if an ad in the db uses licensed music that regular content creators use in their videos too, it will eventually lead to blocking some segments wrongly, unless the db excludes this, making it less effective at its purpose... Maybe image is better.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That's not quite how it works. It's crowdsourced, someone has to manually add every sponsored segment from a video into Sponsorblock. It can't detect them on its own.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

I never said it did?