Intel
Rules
-
Be civil. Uncivil language, slurs, and insults will result in a ban. If you can't say something respectfully, don't say it at all.
-
No Unoriginal Sources, Referral links or Paywalled Articles.
-
All posts must be related to Intel or Intel products.
-
Give competitors' recommendations only where appropriate. If a user asks for Intel only (i.e. i5-12600k vs i5-13400?) recommendations, do not reply with non-Intel recommendations. Commenting on a build pic saying they should have gone AMD/Nvidia is also inappropriate, don't be rude. Let people enjoy things.
-
CPU Cooling problems: Just like 95C is normal for Ryzen, 100C is normal for Intel CPUs in many workloads. If you're worried about CPU temperatures, please look at reviews for the laptop or CPU cooler you're using.
view the rest of the comments
OP I'm not sure why everyone is missing the point of your question, I thought it was pretty obvious. Windows/Intel laptops have had pretty embarrassing performance for a long time. I have a 4 core 1135g7 in a thin and light laptop, and the fans still run up and blast when doing anything more than Internet browsing. Meanwhile an M1 MacBook air has higher performance in just about every way and it can sustain that performance fanless and have better battery life.
Obviously any laptop CPU is going to be more constrained than a desktop CPU, both in available power and cooling. But you're hoping that meteor lake will be a fast enough architecture that even at a low power draw will be snappy enough to confidently use for a long time on battery, unlike current Intel laptop chips.
Anyone who says apple M series laptops are in the same predicament as Intel ones is being disingenuous. There is an obvious capability gap between Intel and apple laptops in battery life, absolute performance, sustained performance, and silence.
That's not really a question but a complaint. Your reformulation of it as a question boils down to "will next gen perform better than the previous gen" to which the answer is yes, it will.