Intel

24 readers

1 users here now

Rules

Be civil. Uncivil language, slurs, and insults will result in a ban. If you can't say something respectfully, don't say it at all.
No Unoriginal Sources, Referral links or Paywalled Articles.
All posts must be related to Intel or Intel products.
Give competitors' recommendations only where appropriate. If a user asks for Intel only (i.e. i5-12600k vs i5-13400?) recommendations, do not reply with non-Intel recommendations. Commenting on a build pic saying they should have gone AMD/Nvidia is also inappropriate, don't be rude. Let people enjoy things.
CPU Cooling problems: Just like 95C is normal for Ryzen, 100C is normal for Intel CPUs in many workloads. If you're worried about CPU temperatures, please look at reviews for the laptop or CPU cooler you're using.

founded 11 months ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

How can i9-14900 be 10% better than i9-13900 in some tests (alien.top)

submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

4 comments fedilink hide all child comments

How can i9-14900 be 10% better than i9-13900 on some benchmarks, even though the clock speed increase is just 0.2/5.8~=3% and the architecture is the same?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Dodgy reviews/testing. Hardware unboxed/GamersNexus show the 13900k/14900k within 1-3% of eachother.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

My 14900k does 40k in cinebench r23 on 240W powerlimit :P Aint no 13900k coming remotely close to that.