this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2023
175 points (97.8% liked)
Gaming
19717 readers
703 users here now
Sub for any gaming related content!
Rules:
- 1: No spam or advertising. This basically means no linking to your own content on blogs, YouTube, Twitch, etc.
- 2: No bigotry or gatekeeping. This should be obvious, but neither of those things will be tolerated. This goes for linked content too; if the site has some heavy "anti-woke" energy, you probably shouldn't be posting it here.
- 3: No untagged game spoilers. If the game was recently released or not released at all yet, use the Spoiler tag (the little ⚠️ button) in the body text, and avoid typing spoilers in the title. It should also be avoided to openly talk about major story spoilers, even in old games.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
So is Half-life: source now the old one or is Half-life the old version? Or did they revamp both? It is a bit unclear in my library.
The one just named "Half Life" is the definitive version now, the one that got the big update yesterday.
Source is the same messy version as it was before and they haven't touched it. Though it will still be in our libraries for legacy versions.
Valve themselves recommend you ignore Source exists now.
IMO Black Mesa is now the definitive version.
What is their reason for abandoning the source version? I would assume it looks better, and it would be easier to fit for today’s gaming needs
If you ask me, the Source version didn't include any QoL improvements or anything that might make the game more modern feeling.
The "upgrades" are mostly new textures and effects that bugged out half the time. Plus all the gameplay bugs that it introduced.
Even before the update most people were recommending the OG above the Source version, so it makes sense that they would update that one.