this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Hardware

33 readers
1 users here now

A place for quality hardware news, reviews, and intelligent discussion.

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If Intel in the response to HUB says "We have no plans to support previous generations for APO", how else are you supposed to interpret it?

Ok, plans may change, but it's very possible Intel will simply keep this locked on 14th gen just to be able to sell them.

For me as a 4K gamer, it doesn't seem like APO brings anything to the table, but it's still disappointing to see software feature gatekeeping without a technical requirement behind it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If Intel in the response to HUB says "We have no plans to support previous generations for APO", how else are you supposed to interpret it?

When a reviewer or journalist reaches out to companies, they usually get a response from someone that has no technical knowledge or insight on future products or changes, unless the inquiry is very serious and then it gets forwarded internally.

Im not saying this wont possibly stay exclusive to 14th gen and beyond, but this response is almost certainly by someone that has zero knowledge of how APO works, what the team working on APO is doing, and if it will come to older generations and what games they are currently testing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

When a reviewer or journalist reaches out to companies, they usually get a response from someone that has no technical knowledge or insight on future products or changes, unless the inquiry is very serious and then it gets forwarded internally.

And that's on them, not on journalists or consumers. It's their job to have messaging in line with the technical side of the business.

Hell, if a PR team is making such explicitly stated messaging without consulting with engineering, it's frankly a disfuncional corporate PR inventing stuff on the spot. We should take them at their word and act accordingly. Eat the damn negative PR from a damn anti-consumerist response. They could have stated it differently if they wanted some margin of interpretation.