this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2023
564 points (96.4% liked)

Science Memes

11217 readers
2316 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
564
peas nutz (mander.xyz)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
22 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes but he likely forged some data. Statistics show a high probability of his pea counts with a clear 3:1 phenome split being too good to be true.

Source: Mathematics of Life by Ian Stewart. I also visited his museum on Mendel Square, Brno.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He also discarded a lot of data that didn't meet his proposed patterns.

How do we know? Well, wouldn't it be a nice coincidence if this motherfucker just casually randomly selected 13 different traits that follow simple dominance patterns - but none of the other dozens of traits that do not?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, he did not quite follow principles of integrity. But let's not understate the impact of his work on biology.