Hardware

33 readers

1 users here now

A place for quality hardware news, reviews, and intelligent discussion.

founded 11 months ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Stratechery: "An Interview with Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger About Intel's Progress" (stratechery.com)

submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

13 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I actually want to have a 3D construct where I have lots of cache in a base die, and put the advanced computing on top of it into a 3D sandwich, and now you get the best of a cache architecture and the best of the next generation of Moore’s law

Not the first time Pat has mentioned a desire for a stacked cache product.

In no way do I think that just because we’ve now demonstrated 18A

Lunar Lake? There is a debate on whether Lunar Lake is actually 18A or 20A. They demo'd Lunar Lake last month, but with it being so early there is speculation if it was actually on 18A, but this suggests that it actually was?

Now, on the other side of it, though, I have to create clean separation between these two businesses and that’s what the internal Foundry model is all about, because I need to be able to go to Qualcomm or AMD or—

Literally calls out AMD as a potential foundry customer and the cliffhanger or would most likely be Nvidia.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Lunar Lake? There is a debate on whether Lunar Lake is actually 18A or 20A. They demo'd Lunar Lake last month, but with it being so early there is speculation if it was actually on 18A, but this suggests that it actually was?

Neither. It's N3B.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

What he proposed isn’t really stacked cache. At least not in the sense AMD does it. It should probably be thought as a separate cache die.