this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Data Hoarder

24 readers
1 users here now

We are digital librarians. Among us are represented the various reasons to keep data -- legal requirements, competitive requirements, uncertainty of permanence of cloud services, distaste for transmitting your data externally (e.g. government or corporate espionage), cultural and familial archivists, internet collapse preppers, and people who do it themselves so they're sure it's done right. Everyone has their reasons for curating the data they have decided to keep (either forever or For A Damn Long Time (tm) ). Along the way we have sought out like-minded individuals to exchange strategies, war stories, and cautionary tales of failures.

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

The price premium for high capacity HDDs is the reduced number of required disks. Hence, less power consumption and simpler hardware to host the HDDs (e.g., 4 slots instead of 6 or 8).

But also increased risk... Its way easier to secure 8* 5TB drives, then 2* 20TB drives.

A 2* 20TB means you need to go Raid 1, where as 8* 5TB drives means you can go 2 Parity and 6 data drives. Aka 30TB usable and 4 times shorter rebuild times. And this also scales to the same effect...

Combine that with something like Unraid, where you do not strip your data over a raid, your chance of a catastrophic loss of all data is WAY less with more smaller drives + parity (and the benefit of more independent filesystems, then one big bulk one. Speaking from experience).

For companies, sure, those guys just make massive arrays with multiple redundancies but for self stores More and smaller is better (in my opinion), what is in major conflict because ironically, the cheapest drives in Germany are in the 14 to 20TB range. And you pay price premiums on the 12 to ... 4TB drives.