this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2023
32 points (88.1% liked)
pics
19315 readers
82 users here now
Rules:
1.. Please mark original photos with [OC] in the title if you're the photographer
2..Pictures containing a politician from any country or planet are prohibited, this is a community voted on rule.
3.. Image must be a photograph, no AI or digital art.
4.. No NSFW/Cosplay/Spam/Trolling images.
5.. Be civil. No racism or bigotry.
Photo of the Week Rule(s):
1.. On Fridays, the most upvoted original, marked [OC], photo posted between Friday and Thursday will be the next week's banner and featured photo.
2.. The weekly photos will be saved for an end of the year run off.
Instance-wide rules always apply. https://mastodon.world/about
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It was grabbed for use in testing image compression algorithms and became the de facto standard.
I don't per-se have any issue with it on ethical grounds, but I do think that it was a bad choice in that it was copyrighted, even if Playboy, who owns the copyright, has been fine with it being used as the standard. I would rather that an image in the public domain have been used, whether of an attractive woman or no. Like, go out, get a high-resolution shot of an attractive guy and an attractive girl, put it in the public domain and then you've addressed both my concerns and the concerns of the people who feel that it doesn't promote equality.
It's not like they planned to make it the standard test image. Just a bunch of guys working on something looking for a quick test image and grabbing the first thing they found.
Such a small section of the original image and at such low resolution would be pretty petty to shut down for copyright infringement. Especially since it was not used for profit, but for scientific research.