this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2023
410 points (94.4% liked)

World News

32376 readers
543 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

But during some of those conversations, managers have told staffers they should not expect to influence U.S. policy on Israel-Palestine regardless of their national security chops, according to five current and one recently departed State Department officials who talked to HuffPost.

Keep in mind, that Biden has asked for a humanitarian cease fire in Gaza. This information is like fresh of last night, so I don't expect news agencies to catch up fast.

It looks like Biden is lagging behind public opinion on this one, but he is turning course.

What that means going forward will depend on how much aid is let in Gaza by Israel.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Biden is specifically avoiding the term "cease-fire":

The White House has refused to call for a cease-fire but has signaled that the Israelis should consider humanitarian pauses to allow civilians to receive aid and for foreign nationals trapped on the strip to leave Gaza.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, but probably because using the term would cause major political problems for him.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Asking for a cease fire to move people out. Nothing about them being able to return to their homes or land.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hitting the breaks on this whole mess is the first step. I will most certainly not call this a victory for just beginning.

But at least now the people in power understand that this is a problem. Versus the previous mindset of:" kill all humans, full speed ahead."

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Forcing people out of their homes so that they can be occupied by Israel isn’t hitting the brakes, it’s accelerating it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

It's like the war on drugs but worse. Technically the US doesn't really have a horse in the race so to speak. I doubt that the USA, nor the oil giants across the Middle East are inclined to involve themselves in a potential paradigm shift of global politics into WW3 directly after the disaster that was Trump's election loss and subsequent social disorder.

Personally although I feel like a one state secular, democratic solution but with multiple internal use passports would suit the whole lot of them better. If you choose to carry card X y or z you become the subject to a different set of religious rules return unique benefits. You can theoretically try to carry all three but you're going to have a hard time computing let alone complying with all of the religious rules all the time.

If we ignore the humanitarian issue of the bombings so to speak, because war, like hell is a gift in itself by all measures, I think the fairest solution would simply be for the most stable, responsible and directly involved guy in the room - Benny boy, to pay up and fix his own shit he's created by actually building more homes and infrastructure on both sides of the fence and giving the Palestinians a card printing system, redraw the lines on the map and let them decide their own laws, rather than kicking people out of their homes and bulldozing stuff without a plan, creating a system of displacement which realistically nobody wants, just to let the terrorists come back and make pipe bombs and other weapons from the scraps.

Hopefully someone found my verbal diarrhoea to be constructive