this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

AMD

26 readers
1 users here now

For all things AMD; come talk about Ryzen, Radeon, Threadripper, EPYC, rumors, reviews, news and more.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
1
With nvidia dropping the price of the 4070 to $549, I think AMD needs to drop the price of the 7800xt to $469 in order to stay competitive. (alien.top)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
20 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Looking at the advantages, the 7800xt has:

  1. 10% lower price

  2. 4 more gigs of vram

  3. 6% better raster performance.

The 4070 has:

  1. Better frame gen

  2. Better upscaling via dlss

  3. Better drivers

  4. Better rt performance

  5. CUDA for the few people that actually need it.

  6. Better power efficiency.

  7. The ability to use both dlss and fsr. If a game just has dlss, amd users are screwed.

All in all I think the AMD card is still the underdog based in advantages and needs to be at least 15% cheaper in order to sway buyers to team red. For just a $50 price difference, the team green advantages are too stacked imo.

Edit: this is of course in the US market. Every market is different.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The FSR 3 situation is absolutely crippling what would be very competitive cards, because game devs are building games with upscaling included to achieve minimum performance, which is death for AMD cards. AMD needs to get FSR 3.x WORKING in games asap with VRR and Antilag+ to compete.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There are 0 games with FSR3 support as of now. I'm not counting the tech demo aka Forspoken and Immortals of Aveum which are mediocre at best

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Isn't starfield fsr exclusive? Or is that still using fsr2?

load more comments (2 replies)