this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2023
7 points (100.0% liked)

Self-Hosted Main

511 readers
1 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

For Example

We welcome posts that include suggestions for good self-hosted alternatives to popular online services, how they are better, or how they give back control of your data. Also include hints and tips for less technical readers.

Useful Lists

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Okay, before you downvote me, hear me out.

I self-host quite a bit of services and am knee-deep in this hobby, like many of you are. I try my best to analyze what makes sense to self-host and what doesn't just so that I don't jump the gun and switch everything over to self-host just for the sake of doing it. I try to focus on what brings value to the table and what doesn't, and I just cannot see the value in self-hosting YouTube front ends. I tried my best to like it and force it on myself for several weeks, but it seems to hinder and ruin the YouTube experience rather than enhance it for me.

I find extensions on desktop such as YouTube Enhancer paired with uBlock Origin is a more enjoyable experience, and on mobile I prefer to use ReVanced. I feel these options are superior to piped/invidious etc.

So tell me, I'm curious. Why do you bother to self-host YouTube when there subjectively appears to be better options?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I've been using youtube-local for maybe a year or more now. "ruin the YouTube experience" is the point for me. Namely I do NOT want a "pleasant" experience because if I do, I'll spend hours and HOURS on that platform instead of working, going out, skating, etc. So... sure if I need to watch a video, it works perfectly but I'm not going to get ANY suggestion, no front page, no recommendation, no autoplay, etc.