this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2023
1199 points (95.5% liked)

memes

10278 readers
2507 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] zalgotext 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

A simple cup of filter coffee is easy enough to make at home with cheap equipment, sure, but espresso/milk drinks are a different story, and some people prefer milk drinks to filter coffee. A decent home espresso machine that can also steam milk is gonna run you around $150 at the low end. Some people don't have that much laying around at once, but can afford the $3 cappuccino a couple times a week.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Thats just poor personal finance then. Paying 3$ a couple times a week, so let's say 4 times, runs you up at 12$ a week. So within 13 weeks you'd have the money to buy a machine.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

couple

4 times

couple

I think we might have different definitions of that word. So it really should be 26 weeks, which we can clarify is 6 months.

So 6 months of saving for a treat a couple times a week? That doesn't sound worth it to most people

[–] zalgotext 1 points 1 year ago

Exactly, thank you. It takes so long just to break even with even the cheapest home espresso equipment, plus you then have to learn to use and maintain said equipment - for some people, the convenience of having a barista fix you a better cup of coffee than you could make yourself at home is worth the $3.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

An aeropress is 40$, so it's even cheaper. 4 weeks or so then based on that math!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I use a moka pot at home with milk and sugar. It's like half way to espresso for much cheaper. When I'm feeling fancy I have a cheap milk frother too. It isn't as good as a real espresso drink, but I get those occasionally as a treat.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

(Actually, a venti cappuccino at Starbucks cost almost $6.)

[–] zalgotext 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A venti drink is like 20oz, is probably at least 3 shots of espresso, and is not comparable to the drinks I'm talking about.

You can get a short cappuccino (8oz) from Starbucks for around $3. This is comparable to most cafe prices for a reasonably sized, single-shot milk drink.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

The crazy thing is that, at least at Starbucks, a Venti hot drink is 2 shots, just like the grande. Paying extra for just more milk and sugar!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

If it costs $150 it isn't an espresso machine. I hope you missed a zero because the other point is pretty bad too in that context.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Depends on whether you consider a Flair a "machine" I guess.. But yeah, I would agree you're probably better off with a moka pot than most $150 or less espresso machines. For $150 budget to make strong coffee with milk type drinks, I'd recommend most folks get a moka pot and milk frother.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I have a 70€ espresso machine. It makes decent espresso, cheaper than paying 1€ at the bar.

[–] zalgotext 1 points 1 year ago

Care to elaborate