this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2023
433 points (98.7% liked)

/kbin meta

110 readers
1 users here now

Magazine dedicated to discussions about the kbin itself. Provide feedback, ask questions, suggest improvements, and engage in conversations related to the platform organization, policies, features, and community dynamics. ---- * Roadmap 2023 * m/kbinDevlog * m/kbinDesign

founded 2 years ago
 

@ernest how do I report a Magazin on kbin.social ? There is a usere called "ps" who is posting to his own "antiwoke" Magazin on kbin.social. Please remove this and dont give them a chance to etablish them self on kbin.social. When I report his stuff it will go to him because he is the moderator of the magazin? Seems like a problem. Screenshot of the "antiwoke" Magazin /sub on kbin.social. 4 Headlines are visible, 2 exampels: "Time to reject the extrem trans lobby harming our society" "How to end wokeness" #Moderation #kbin #kbin.social ๐Ÿ“Ž

edit: dont feed the troll, im shure ernest will delet them all when he sees this. report and move on.

Edit 2 : Ernest responded:
"I just need a little more time. There will likely be a technical break announced tomorrow or the day after tomorrow. Along with the migration to new servers, we will be introducing new moderation tools that I am currently working on and testing (I had it planned for a bit later in my roadmap). Then, I will address your reports and handle them very seriously. I try my best to delete sensitive content, but with the current workload and ongoing relocation, it takes a lot of time. I am being extra cautious now. The regulations are quite general, and I would like to refine them together with you and do everything properly. For now, please make use of the option to block the magazine/author."

โค

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You are a retarded person. Discussing this with you, with you taking pride in rejecting unified scientific finding, shows you are not just ignorant but proud of it. Discussion with you is futile, because you do not want to discuss or change your mind. You want your weird little shit ideas to be right, in spite of all the evidence presented to you by society over many years.

You are not an intelligent man. You are not reasonable. Your position is not right, or even defensible anymore. By clinging to it, you disqualify yourself from rational conversation at the adults table.

There is no point discussing with you if you make your own facts and live in your own imagined world where right is wrong. I implore you, stop being such an asinine person and look at IPCC data projection. Look at them and think about what they mean for your life and the world around you. As long as you refuse to recognize the data before you, you cannot be reasoned with. Goodbye. I hope you get better.

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

@GataZapata @ernest @Noki Thank you for proving my point in my previous post. This time with more bravado and gusto. Bravo.... (Lmao)

Attacking my personal character.

Unwilling to do an open, honest, and fair debate.

Flips the table, rage quits, and storms off like they've won.

It is both hilarious, childish, and beyond pathetic.

Here's to hoping that you mature and grow up, but we both know that probably will never happen.

Cheers!

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/61/fe/66/61fe66908afe87f7a5c520835eb6c8c0.jpg

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I don't attack your character. I attack the pride with which you hold on to easily disproven ideas. It makes you dumb.

I cannot do a real argument with you- you have no point. All the evidence is stacked against you. There is simply no point in you repeating lies to me.

You have also not provided a single argument in this exchange-what climate change theories have been disproven, for example. Your first coent says 'all of them' but you never specify, never cite a source or anything else. Because you can't. You pull it out of your ass to ragebait and then act like a high and mighty intellectual. But you are the opposite-you deny knowledge and hold on to your weird ideas in spite of facts being repeated to you from all sides. There is no productive discourse to be had with you.

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@GataZapata @ernest @Noki You didn't ask for evidence. You didn't even want to hear what I had to say.

You just said the evidence is stacked against you so why would I listen to what one person has to say? Then attacked me personally, not my pride (lol).

This is the attitude of a child who isn't capable of an adult argument. A person who treats science as a religion, but can't be scientific themselves. A scientist, or open minded person would be interested to see any evidence could I provide.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Provide then. I would be astounded if you could produce a scientifically sound and peer reviewed source that disproves climate change. In fact, I think producing such resultds would net you several honor-tenures and or Nobel prizes.

If you cannot, I am happy to send you a veritable library of recognized scholars who say the exact opposite of your take.

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

@GataZapata @ernest @Noki Now that I called you out on your shit you want to try and act like an adult to save face for being childish?

Nope, you don't get the satisfaction. Not, because I can't have a debate with you, but rather you no longer deserve it.

Everyone in the Fediverse saw your true nature and depths of patheticness today.

You had your chance to have an open, honest, and civil debate. You fucked up. Now I'm going to treat you like the child you are and tell you to go to your room.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

So you have no sources for your wild takes. When pressed you cannot provide a single one and deflect like an 8th grader without homework lol.

The accusations you have launched at me during this exchange are projections of what you argue like.

Thanks for clearing up that you don't actually have a point. Bye