this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2023
633 points (92.0% liked)

Technology

59708 readers
1920 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 210 points 1 year ago (2 children)

BuT bRaVE isN't ThaT bAd 🤡

[–] [email protected] 118 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Yep, this news actually broke a couple days ago, I remember seeing a Brave fanboy having a meltdown over it and ranting about how Mozilla is the real shady company, blah, blah, blah.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Oh dear lord. What did they say in support of their “Mozilla is shady” argument?

[–] [email protected] 71 points 1 year ago

Brave's CEO was fired from Mozilla so Mozilla bad.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

To be fair. Mozilla foundation is shady. They keep pushing things that don't follow their core mission. That try to expand their brand.

You can use Mozilla to build solid privacy respecting systems, but Firefox out of the box not so much. They're better than Google, but that's a low fucking bar.

Mullvad browser, Tor browser, mull for Android - all use the core Firefox open source engine, to make privacy respecting programs that work out of the box with privacy respecting defaults.

So I would say Mozilla is a good guy in this conversation, but not a saint.

[–] [email protected] 53 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Though they are transparent with the fact that they are doing it. I'm not a fan of it either, but it's not too shady when they're open about it IMO.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Fair enough, they aren't evil to be sure.

The Mozilla telemetry, pocket, Mozilla synchronization, experiments, the new tab page basically being an advertisement page. That leaves the sour taste in my mouth, so I don't trust them because of that... Shady good guy vibes:)

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They're doing what they think they need to justify their existence, and although I personally believe being just a great browser would be enough I appreciate their communication around their ventures. It's not great, but it's not like they're installing malware in the background.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And may I point out that just being a great browser hasn't worked out so well for Firefox so far. Unfortunately in today's day and age you have to promote yourself to stand out. Chrome is an abject piece of crap that actively spies on you and yet Google's PR has managed to convince the vast majority to use it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

It’s also worth noting that Chrome’s security model is much more robust than Firefox’s. Acting like Firefox is superior in every regard only serves to undercut Mozilla’s pleas for more contributors and funding.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

https://itsfoss.com/firefox-looking-glass-controversy/

They get pretty close sometimes. I respect their mojo, but I don't install vanilla Firefox anymore. On anything. For any reason. I don't trust them anymore.

I wish them the best, if I could donate directly to Firefox development I would, but it's impossible with them. So I don't. I donate to mullvad, I donate to the Tor project, and I donate to servo. That's what I can do to make sure we maintain an open and free web

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Mullvad are a for profit company . Why do u donate to them ?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's a great point. I totally thought they were non-profit. They're just so on brand with my personal ethos I just assumed.

But yeah checking they're not. Totally wrong about that. Thanks for pointing it out

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I dont get why everyone bitches about Pocket, tbh. Ive been a Pocket user for years and Mozilla's purchase of them has made them better if anything.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've always liked the idea of pocket and have tried to get into using it multiple times but sadly I'm a savage who hates even using bookmarks for some reason. I just keep all of it in my brain (which tends to mean I do not keep it at all).

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

It took me a long time to get used to pocket, not gonna lie. But once I did, I can't live without it.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

They keep trying to make money so they don't go under if/when Google pulls the plug on their easy money.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Probably something about Google.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah if it's the comment chain that I think they're referring to, I believe it came down to Mozilla "being in bed with Google" because Google is the default search engine.

I'll take the default search engine being Google over things like affiliate links being hijacked, but maybe I'm crazy for taking that position.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Typical Brave user hating google while using chrome with preinstalled extensions. Everything about that browser is the opposite of what it should be. Same with the users.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I follow Ghacks, a tech site, as well and boy there is a Brave shill on there who attacks everyone there for daring to say anything against it. He knows stuff, judging from his comments, yet is so anti Mozilla and pro Brave that I can't understand. Almost thinks anyone not using Brave is inferior.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It's not good to stereotype people. But, I would bet money that they have any three of these: bought ~~NFCs~~ NFTs unironically, supports OpenAI unconditionally, propose blockchain on everything, bought a pizza with bitcoin years ago that would be millions of dollars today and are still salty about it, have a Starlink receiver, drive a beaten down Tesla they can't afford to repair because they spent their money paying for FSD early access, and would definitely be first in line to fly Starship to Mars if they were allowed to, they posts to imageai regularly.

EDIT: autocorrect.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Yes, that pizza for Bitcoin story is quite popular, though it happened in very early days of the currency. Also, I assume you meant NFTs instead of NFCs :p. For a second, I was wondering what did near field communication had to do with this.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

don't you just love projection?

cant accept the facts, so deflect the criticism to something else that is in no way a valid target for them.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've actually been attacked on several occasions by brave fan boys when I casually mentioned that I switched to Firefox and loved it. Idk what their deal is but I find it hilarious that all this stuff is coming out about brave recently 🤣

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

They're literally on the payroll. It's a pyramid scheme.