Open Source

30221 readers

212 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

311

APK for searching and subscribing to Youtube, Twitch, and more in a single feed (youtu.be)

submitted 11 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

91 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I just downloaded and have been loving this. It loads pretty quickly, navigation is intuitive, and I'll finally stop forgetting that Nebula exists because it'll all be in my one big subscription feed.

Since I'm new to moving over to open source, I want to ask the veterans: is this as incredible as it seems right now, or is there something I'm missing?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You speak very confidently of things that happened long before you were born. If you actually read the article, I wouldn't have to spell this out for you. OSI was founded in 1998, and "open source" was a term coined in the 1980s.

I could form the Spaghetti Source Initiative tomorrow and claim that all open source code is now called Spaghetti Source, and you wouldn't give a shit about that, would you?

Stallman was a champion of open source software and free software (which were always two different things) long before OSI formed.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Maybe you should form that spaghetti source initiative.

You’d have some authority to speak about what spaghetti source is then.

I did not say that free software and open source software are the same thing.

You brought free software into the argument.

This license that the OP software is using probably isn’t even free software, though.

Though, I personally don’t really care too much about it.

Open source has a definition and it’s the OSI definition.

I hope any other argument you bring is an actual different definition other than „it doesn’t have any“. Because that is a net negative point to make.

If you don’t like the OSI definition I’d hope you bring a competing one. Maybe as part of your spaghetti source initiative.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Do you need smaller words? OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE IS OLDER THAN THE OSI.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Too bad. Thought you’d be smarter than this. Have a nice day, smart guy.