this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2023
72 points (76.9% liked)

conservative

920 readers
72 users here now

A community to discuss conservative politics and views.

Rules:

  1. No racism or bigotry.

  2. Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn't provide the right to personally insult others.

  3. No spam posting.

  4. Submission headline should match the article title (don't cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  5. Shitposts and memes are allowed until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.

  6. No trolling.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
72
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

An insightfull article on what pro-forced birth is actually about.

A reminder that voting GOP and wanting to reduce human suffering are mutually exclusive. The choice is yours.

Spoiler: Like always, it was never about the babies.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

For the record, I did not argue for no welfare.
.
Its perfectly logical to say “I’m anti-murder but not pro-welfare.”

I dunno, I'd say if you say both in the same sentence, you probably haven't actually cared enough to consider welfare to counteract your "anti-murder" stance

So it's perfectly fair to say that what you are arguing would lead to unnecessary death just from your negligence to follow through. You're effectively just trying to hand waive it off as "we'll worry about it later" when it's already too late.