this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
678 points (98.4% liked)
Greentext
3770 readers
1601 users here now
This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.
Be warned:
- Anon is often crazy.
- Anon is often depressed.
- Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.
If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.
founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
WFH solves at least three of those problems, but only if our corporate lords allow it.
Wfh only benefits a pretty small subset of the population... Speaking as someone who can't work from home.
It still benefits you by greatly reducing traffic.
I work a graveyard shift so traffic doesn't really affect me. Which I'm sure is at least somewhat common among the people who can't wfh.
Yeah, I work in an underground lair in a barracks. It wouldn't benefit me either, so not much interest in supporting it. I'd rather we vote for faster escalators. Now that's something everyone can use.