this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2023
40 points (100.0% liked)

Everything Science

429 readers
7 users here now

it is the place for high quality scientific content that doesn't necessarily reference a peer-reviewed paper from the last 6 months.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Look back at the chronicle of global pandemics, and the flu pandemic of 1918 stands out as an anomaly for one reason: According to the history books, it struck healthy adults in their prime just as often, if not more so, than the weak or sickly.

This assumption has influenced research and literature for decades.

But new research published Oct. 9 in the journal PNAS suggests it may not be true at all.

In examining the skeletal remains of nearly 400 individuals, researchers from the University of Colorado Boulder and McMaster University found that in 1918—just like in 2020—people exposed to environmental, social or nutritional stressors before-hand were significantly more likely to succumb to a novel virus when it emerged.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just adding my two cents here, but this might be an example of survivorship bias - if enough of the weak, elderly, frail, already sick etc. people died before they could be taken to a hospital (or their relatives couldn't afford treatment and didn't even attempt to call a doctor) then the hospitals would have been full of people "in their prime" instead, skewing the statistics accordingly. It would not necessarily be that "the young were remembered better" but instead that only/mostly the young and healthy patients made it to the doctors in the first place.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I'd say some of that and some of it being that we didn't know to label some of these preexisting problems or environmental stressors as being a differentiating factor.