Technology

57432 readers

3502 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

575

USB inventor explains why the connector was not designed to be reversible (www.pcgamer.com)

submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

254 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 35 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

USB-C has more connectors for data and power than A/B so it's not a surprise that it's more capable.

What's really changed is demand. No one really expected USB to be used to power everything, it was only ever really expected to be used on computers and maybe digital cameras, smartphones used to arrange matters for themselves. It was only when they two began to adopt USB aas well that calls for smaller ports and higher capacity cables started to arise.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago (5 children)

No one really expected USB to be used to power everything

Yeah, it's not like the U stands for Universal or something.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Yeah, Universal Spower Bus. Sounds right. I was reading the "power" part emphasized in the comment you replied to. Prior to mass adoption by phone mfrs, USB wasn't powering all that much. You'd usually have 5v wall wart and cable ending in a barrel connector. Hate those things.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

I chuckled more than I would like to admit about that spelled out USB name, dunno, it's funny

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The Universal Spower Bus

sounds like an awesome transit vehicle!

Let's take a ride!

Edit: Spower is a contraction of Space and Power. Yes, you heard me right. It's running on spinfinite space power!

And there you have it,

The Universal Spower Bus:

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

I'm not really sure what that means. The original A/B specification did not allow for much variable voltage. It's only universal in name, not in nature. There was absolutely no way to deal with high voltage devices, the cables were not adaptive.

USB 4.0 specification allows for powering things like electrical drills. No way the original USB A/B specification can handle that.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

As long as it's a serial bus

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

You are right to an extent but the context of its original universality is in the rest of the name. Universal serial bus. The idea was a universal port for dealing with data and connections not neccesarily power.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

And yet it still can't retingulate droopglers. Pathetic.

[–] Socsa 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

We are way past it being just a power thing though. USB-C is effectively the standard wired general purpose data bus these days. It's slowly cannibalizing HDMI and DP as well (via thunderbolt), in addition to power cords.