this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2023
21 points (92.0% liked)

Games

17036 readers
1037 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

This doesn't look bad, but I feel like bringing back Goldeneye style shooters is a bad idea. Like, I get it's nostalgia and all but there's a reason why that game is stuck and forgotten on N64, it just didn't age well at all. It might've been good for it's time and platform of choice, but I'd say that in retrospect it's easily one of the weakest shooters from the 90s, especially in comparison to games like Quake, Unreal and Half-Life.

[โ€“] Drbreen 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Why must everything be compared? If I pull out my N64 and Goldeneye and have a round of single player or multiplayer with mates, fun is still to be had. No one is sitting there thinking, this is shit compared to Quake. These games have their place in the hearts of many because of its gameplay and I for one welcome a new game that honours this era for what it was.

load more comments (3 replies)