this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2023
42 points (92.0% liked)

Games

31793 readers
868 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] candyman337 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's because Nvidia still has the leg up on rtx, but that doesn't mean Nvidia shouldn't be thinking about it. I'm not talking about what the market directs them to do, I'm talking about what I hate personally

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I mean they did this generation technically. All of the rtx 4000 cards sans the 4090 are fairly efficient... only because nvidia moved the names of the gpu for each tier thats not the halo card.

Point is, you cant have everything and people generally prioritize performance first. Because efficiency has rarely gave either gpu company more profit gpu wise.

If you cared about efficiency, Nvidia answer to people would be buying their RTX 4000 SFF Ada(75w ~3060ti perf) or RTX 6000 Ada... if you can afford it.