this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2023
666 points (92.2% liked)

Games

31749 readers
1364 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

This should be illegal, companies should be forced to open-source games (or at least provide the code to people who bought it) if they decide to discontinue it, so people can preserve it on their own.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

And when you download the processed video and reupload it, it's a 1 to 1 conversion of the same video codec, and every generation it gets worse. That example is a low hanging fruit, but the concept applies to everything.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That 1:1 conversion through the same codec is very likely lossy. However that's not a straight file copy which is what you originally said causes degradation.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You really jumped in here to tell me exactly the contents of a comment I made just below it in the thread, as if I didn't already know it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I jumped in to point out the flaw in the YouTube experiment you're referring to.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Can you think of a better visual example that a simple person could see and understand?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Imo, an easy way to remove YouTube's postprocessing from the equation would be to copy a video file to and from a nas or other computer several times and compare it with the untouched file.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No, this is because YouTube compresses every file before distributing it. This happens even when downloading on the creator side.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago

Literally every file distribution method compresses the media first. A better argument was that YouTube re-encodes the video during the re-upload with a particularly lossy method to save on bandwidth and server space.