this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2023
809 points (96.4% liked)

Technology

58091 readers
3119 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The actor told an audience in London that AI was a “burning issue” for actors.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Art is just combining previously learnt techniques together with a specific subject.

If that's what you look for in art then sure, but I disagree with that definition. A child's drawing of her dad has aspects to it that a picture of that dad taken in a photo booth can never have. A poem about war is much more meaningful when it comes from a refugee. The Wikipedia page for art lists several 'purposes' and most of them are not something AI art can ever fulfil.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You can't say ever. It could learn every diary and report from war ever and write amazing stuff. It's just a matter of time. It's currently limited by computer power quite significantly.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

It could do that, but its writing would be hollow because those stories are meaningful due to the lived experiences behind them. For example anyone who's read The Diary of a Young Girl could write something similar in Anne Frank's style, but it wouldn't be nearly as impactful because learning about an event is very different from living through it.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

It's limited by the trends of human art. The art and text AI that we have are based on pattern processing. They output what is expected based on what we feed it. They aren't able to come up with entirely new styles or philosophies. They don't even have a cognitive ability to have any philosophy. An AI describing a tree or depicting an image of a tree doesn't have an understanding of what a tree is, they are not aware of the world, they can only replicate human words and images.

A breakthrough needs to happen for them to be capable of anything more, but that's going to be its own can of worms.