this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2023
84 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

200 readers
39 users here now

@politics on kbin.social is a magazine to share and discuss current events news, opinion/analysis, videos, or other informative content related to politicians, politics, or policy-making at all levels of governance (federal, state, local), both domestic and international. Members of all political perspectives are welcome here, though we run a tight ship. Community guidelines and submission rules were co-created between the Mod Team and early members of @politics. Please read all community guidelines and submission rules carefully before engaging our magazine.

founded 2 years ago
 

Conservatives say liberals want to kill talk radio. But there’s plenty else on the AM dial – much of it essential

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I love how people here ignore that most government notifications about emergencies is over AM radio.

Who needs to be notified about sudden storms/tornados/accidents/AMBER Alerts while they drive the US? /s

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Most people get their emergency notifications on their mobile phone.

Don't have a mobile phone in the year 2020+??

Then you're doing it wrong.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Phones are great for emergency notifications but I think AM would be better for long-term sustained emergencies. It's a highly highly unlikely event though.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Today is day 6 of some people still not having power after the recent barrage of nearly hurricane-strength storms along the southern US.

Those cheap AM/FM/weather radios that run off AA batteries are invaluable.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Phones require cell towers, internet backhauls, data centers, satellites, and power. I agree that phones are an absolutely fantastic first-line platform for emergency notifications. You still need more, though. There are many emergency scenarios that can hamper or disable cellular communication. Emergency preparedness is all about having redundancy and contingency plans. AM radio is extremely primitive, meaning it's low power, easy to run, and easy to repair. It's a fantastic option for a backup emergency warning system. Most people have one AM radio nowadays, and that's in their car. I think keeping that option around is a good idea, considering how cheap AM radio components are.

EDIT: I'll add that I'm fairly progressive. I just believe in defense-in-depth. Information is really important during emergencies, and we should have many ways to warn people that they're in danger.

[–] socialjusticewizard 1 points 1 year ago

This is incredibly shortsighted.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Does that mean you have to be on AM radio to hear about emergencies? That's real stupid, I honestly forgot AM radio existed, why not just broadcast to FM?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Yes you would have to be listening to an AM station. I almost never listen to the radio, but when I do it is an FM station. The EBS breaks into that when any emergency arises.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

AM is more effective for true emergency situations where civilization has broken down because the section of the spectrum it uses naturally propagates further. You can hear an AM station over a much larger area than an FM station.

[–] socialjusticewizard 1 points 1 year ago

AM radio is not only longer range, as the person above already noted, but a highly stable and maintainable old technology requiring minimal functional infrastructure. It is perfect for emergency broadcasts. It's actually idiotic to remove am radio, it's a classic case of manufacturers trying to save a few cents because they don't give a shit about public safety.