this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2023
104 points (96.4% liked)

Green Energy

2282 readers
3 users here now

Everything about energy production and storage.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why not both ?

I don't think I've seen any long term scenario with only nuclear and no solar energy.

On the other hand adding a bit of nuclear in the mix can really help to reduce the amount of solar panel needed.

The simulation done for France show that 13% of nuclear in the grid can roughly divide by almost two the amount of solar, batteries and thermal power station needed compared to a 100% renewables energies simulation.

https://rte-futursenergetiques2050.com/panorama/scenarios

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The amount of Batterie and Solar between M0 (100% renewable) and M23 (87 % renewable and 13 % nuclear with a Fokus on solar over Wind) is almost the same tough.

Where do you see a dividig by two?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

M0 uses 26GW of batteries and 208GW of solar panels.

M23 uses 13GW of batteries and 125GW of solar panels.