this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2023
30 points (91.7% liked)

Hacker News

202 readers
3 users here now

This community serves to share top posts on Hacker News with the wider fediverse.

Rules0. Keep it legal

  1. Keep it civil and SFW
  2. Keep it safe for members of marginalised groups

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The Department of Justice kicked off its antitrust trial against Google this week by presenting evidence that Google allegedly hid monopolistic behaviors not just by auto-deleting four years of chats, but also by training employees to avoid using certain words in office communications.

DOJ attorney Kenneth Dintzer argued that Google executives knew the company would be scrutinized as a monopoly and since at least 2003 have circulated "unambiguous instructions on phrases" employees should "avoid" to ensure that the company doesn't "come across like monopolists," Bloomberg reported.

“We should be careful about what we say in both public and private,” Google's chief economist, Hal Varian, wrote in a July 2003 memo.

During a 2011 training called "Antitrust Basics for Search Team," Google also directed employees to "avoid metaphors involving wars or sports, winning, or losing."

One particular phrase that documents showed Varian said to avoid was "cutting off their air supply," which Bloomberg pointed out was "a quip used years earlier by then-Microsoft Corp Chief Executive Officer Steve Ballmer, when his company was under federal antitrust scrutiny."

The DOJ's pre-trial brief specifically used this phrase to refer to Google's alleged monopolistic behaviors, writing that the DOJ "will demonstrate that Google has maintained its durable monopolies in general search services—and the related advertising markets that fund it—by cutting off the air supply to Google’s rivals, denying them access to user data and the scale needed to compete."


The original article contains 357 words, the summary contains 235 words. Saved 34%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

open source

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.