A lot of lies of wrong stuff here

You're certainly doing your part. Example:

The environment for example is much more damaged by renewables, because you need truckloads of space to build the wind or solar farm

Utilizing available space for renewables is hardly damage, is it? The rest of your post isn't much better.

The entirety of the US could be powered by solar power if they converted 10% of land which is just parking spaces to solar farming, and there would still be enough parking spaces left in the country to have seven for every car. The amount of land required for the benefits is completely inconsequential.

Meanwhile, for nuclear:

• more CO2 equivalent emissions per kWh than renewables
• very harmful extraction of uranium ore
• industrial processes to refine uranium ore are polluting
• huge quantities of concrete are consumed to build a nuclear plant, concrete is an extremely environmentally harmful material
• huge amounts of industrial traffic moving astronomical quantities of materials across the country for building and dismantling plants
• huge amounts of water consumed and irradiated by operating plants
• much more maintenance required