Recommended Readings:
- The Philosophy of Social Ecology by Murray Bookchin.
- Mutual Aid by Pyotr Kropotkin.
- The Dispossessed by Ursula K Le Guin (fiction)
this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2023
477 points (99.6% liked)
196
16604 readers
2454 users here now
Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.
Rule: You must post before you leave.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
They do have a profit insentive though. It's just not a monetary one
This is correct, phosphorus and nitrogen is exchanged for carbohydrates. Mutually beneficial symbiosis.
I’m all about enlightened self-interest.
Like, altruism is rad and all, but some people are only ever going to be helpful if they stand to gain something, and it’s best we remind them of what they stand to gain at every opportunity.
Altruism is not without reward, even if it seems like it is. No one acts selflessly for no reason, they do so because they are rewarded by their body with dopamine and other "reward" hormones - i.e. because it feels good to do so.
Ok Corduroy Jackson Jackson
Dopamine is what drives humans.
This is often called externalities. I don't mind this argument, after all, leftism is based on Economics. Marx was an economist. And modern economics sweeps over this to propogandize students about adam smith and grt them to argue over modrrn neoliberal issues. However, we all stand to gain the farther left we go - the only of those who don't are the owner class who squeezes us dry.
Marx was an economist like Freud was a psychologist
Only if you believe the lies capitalism created and encourages in to fruition in order to exist and survive:
https://theconversation.com/humans-arent-inherently-selfish-were-actually-hardwired-to-work-together-144145
Benefit ≠ profit.